Wednesday, October 27, 2010

CMA 2010 Predictions



The 44th Annual Country Music Awards take place on Wednesday, November 10th. As the most prestigious award show in country music, the CMA's mean a lot to both the artists and the fans. Country music legend George Strait has won the most CMA's in history with 22. The most coveted award, Entertainer of the Year, has been won four times by two men, Kenny Chesney and Garth Brooks. Here are my picks for the 44th Annual CMA's.

Music Video of the Year: White Liar by Miranda Lambert. A fun video directed by the always creative Chris Hicky.

Single of the Year: The House That Built Me by Miranda Lambert. Not my favorite song but you have to respect the genius behind its lyrics.

Album of the Year: Need You Now by Lady Antebellum. From a sales standpoint, no one in all of music has outsold this megahit album.

Vocal Duo of the Year: Brooks and Dunn. A sentimental pick, the soon-to-be retired country vets could wrap up their 15th award in this category.

Vocal Group of the Year: Lady Antebellum. Would love to see Zac Brown Band come away with the award, but Lady A. is too much of a force to be reckoned with.

New Artist of the Year: Zac Brown Band. Why is Zac Brown Band even nominated in this category? How are they new?

Male Vocalist of the Year: Keith Urban. Could be a tossup between the Aussie and George. Urban dominated 2010 in terms of airplay.

Female Vocalist of the Year: Miranda Lambert. The Nashville Star winner has come a long way from her "Kerosene" days. As Taylor Swift continues her pop transformation, Miranda will continue to be the queen of country music.

Entertainer of the Year: Keith Urban. Urban has been a Tour de Force in 2010. Urban won entertainer of the year in 2005.

Monday, October 25, 2010

Welcome to the Young Bull Briefing



Welcome to the Young Bull Briefing. Each post that appears on this blog will touch upon current issues in the areas of sports, business, pop culture and politics. While my opinions are solely my own, I welcome any comments agreeing, supplementing, or challenging my views. I like to think of myself as 70% tell-it-like-it-is truth, 30% political correctness. Therefore, I see no future for myself on NPR.

In terms of where the name comes from for this blog, the best explanation comes from a user-created dictionary called urbandictionary.com. If you follow the link, the second definition on the page is the most applicable. Young Bull is a slang term that describes a younger person of the male gender. Its counterpart, Old Head derives from the same origins. Old Heads are distinguished by an extensive knowledge of the world, a sense of street smarts that Young Bulls do not have yet. It is my belief that we are all Young Bulls constantly striving to be Old Heads. Silly terminology but it's the thought counts.

Now to the topic of the first post...

Being a Yankees fan, I watched the American League Championship Series with a high-level of interest. Unfortunately for the Bronx Bombers, there was a team in the AL with a better overall team, the Texas Rangers. The manager of the Rangers is a man by the name of Ron Washington. In March 2010, it was revealed by Sports Illustrated reporter Jon Heyman that Washington had tested positive for cocaine use in a MLB drug test administered the year before. Washington subsequently apologized to the fans and the media, even offering his team the option to have him resign. The team refused and Washington went on his way albeit he would not escape becoming the butt of several jokes (see picture above).

Now back to the 2010 Major League playoffs. Washington's Rangers, who had previously never won a playoff series in their franchise history, beat the AL East champion Tampa Bay Rays, a team that had compiled the best AL record in 2010. The Rangers' next opponent, the New York Yankees, had won more World Series than the Rangers had even played playoff games. Behind superior pitching and hitting, the Texas Rangers reached their first World Series in their history.

This brings me to the topic of this post. Does winning cure all? It's often been said by sports analysts that sports figures with troubled pasts often are shunned by fans until they can prove themselves when they get back on the field. Maybe Washington isn't the best example but the winning cure all phenomenon certainly exists. To paint a better picture, think about the following athletes: Ben Roethlisberger, Tiger Woods, Kobe Bryant, Ray Lewis, Alex Rodriguez, and Ron Artest. With the exception of Roethlisberger and Woods (but keep their names in mind) all of these athletes went on to win a championship in their respective sport after going through serious issues on and off the field. Did the fans embrace these athletes before the championship was won? Sure. But if there were losses instead of wins would these players still have had the kind of support the following (non-championship winning) season?

Back to the subject of Roethlisberger and Woods. Both are trying to put recent off-the-field misconduct in the past. What will it take for the sports media/fans to get past both their off-the-field misdeeds? If both go on to win championships in their respective sports, all will be forgotten. A new chapter in their books will be written. If their on-the-field performance doesn't stack up, their sins of the past will be made out to be part of some greater force, a bad karma of sorts. Why do sports fans dole out forgiveness in exchange for wins? I'm not saying it's right or wrong, it's just something we as human beings do. And they say sports and social issues aren't connected...